Wednesday, July 28, 2010

TL's and the Issue of RBL Vs RBT

In beginning my Masters of Education (TL), I have realised, two weeks in to the course that it has opened up a whole new vocabulary, meta-language and array of acronyms that I am sure will be rolling off my tongue in no time at all. My head is buzzing with RBL, RBT (I used to think that stood for a random breath test)

It is my understanding that Resource Based Learning (RBL) = Student Centred Learning. When the teacher acts as facilitator and assesses while teaching, they guide students learning through questioning and prompts, structuring the learning environment, previewing resources, acting as a resource and engaging in dialogue with the student about their path. As opposed to Resource based Teaching (RBT) the teachers using the resources to support or enhance their teaching. Therefore RBL hands the reins to the students by providing them with the scaffolding and support they need to become confident lifelong learners.

For me, the key issues TL’s are facing in Australia seem to be financial and organisational ones. There is a lack of funding for TL’s time allocation and resource budget. Although the ideal model would be to adopt a flexible learning environment (RBL), the biggest hurdle seems to be focused on organisational and financial constraints.

There is a lot of power in being a positive and energetic role model is a school to bring about positive change. If you have the drive and determination (and the support of your Principal and Teachers) then these obstacles can be overcome. Therefore the key word here is COLLABORATION!